The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Obtain, analyse and share information on impact of emergency
|
|
A comprehensive knowledge base is developed using existing networks and reliable sources of information. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Available data and information are analysed to reveal patterns and trends. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recovery needs of the affected community and special needs of vulnerable groups are identified in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Needs analysis is reviewed as circumstances change. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A package of recovery functions and services is designed to meet identified needs. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis outcomes and chosen service model are documented and provided to relevant stakeholders and service providers. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan the delivery of recovery functions and services
|
|
Relevant agencies and community representatives are engaged in planning and decision making. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant legislation, regulations and emergency arrangements are identified and applied. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Pre prepared recovery plans are applied/adapted to suit recovery functions and services. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Likely impacts of the event are modelled to determine how needs and required recovery services may change. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Capacity and capability to deliver required recovery services is reviewed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recovery priorities are established by considering political context, public expectations, required services and available resources. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Appropriate delivery strategies are developed in consultation with stakeholders prior to community endorsement and multi agency commitment. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Coordinate the delivery of recovery functions and services
|
|
Stakeholders and service providers are given regular, up to date information about the event, impacts, likely developments and service priorities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resources are managed to ensure that recovery functions and services are delivered effectively. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Workloads are managed to ensure the well being of all staff. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Incoming information about needs and service delivery is collected, analysed and used to review priorities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Delivery of recovery functions and services is adjusted in response to changing circumstances and priorities and in conjunction with other functions and services. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community, political and media expectations and interests are managed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Transition to mainstream services is managed sensitively and in a timely manner. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate the delivery of recovery functions and services
|
|
Feedback from stakeholders and service providers is sought, collected and analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Operational records, minutes of meetings and records of decisions are analysed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Instances where recovery services were deficient or poorly delivered are identified and analysed and recommendations to improve future practice made. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluation outcomes are reported to key stakeholders to inform future recovery planning and models of service delivery. Completed |
Evidence:
|